The sensitivity of a detector usually refers to an ability to pick up tiny objects. If you're searching for such tiny objects then sensitivity is a blessing. If you're looking for small objects that aren't tiny then it might be a curse. It is a blurse (tm) and I will explain why I think so.
A fool unwittingly went detecting in steel reinforced trainers. It wasn't clear why his detector malfunctioned and he found very little but at the same time I noticed a higher than usual proportion of targets was non-ferrous.
I found out that the trainers were culpable and this made me more curious. Why should you detect less iron with them on? I thought the ground tracking must have tuned to the trainers, but this is unlikely, because it wasn't a ground tracking detector.
My guess was that it was to do with the obvious loss of depth caused by the trainers. I took a different machine (for the sake of scientific rigour) to the same site and searched at minimum sensitivity. That machine had a large range on the sensitivity control - some are not so extreme. It gave the same result: fewer targets all-round but a high proportion of non ferrous.
Can you work out what was happening?
It took me ages. I guessed that it might be to do with the size of targets but this made no sense as I couldn't see why ferrous targets should be bigger or smaller than non-ferrous. Critically, I couldn't see how sensitivity should be able to grade targets in this way.












