Best practice with 'hedge fodder'

Metal detecting guide and tips.
neilpw
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Charlbury, Oxfordshire
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 268 times

Post by neilpw »

sweepstick47 wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 3:34 pm Being a responsible detectorist means unless there's an arrangement with the farmer/landowner to leave scrap in a designated place, leave only your footprints behind [81/] Eric
Thanks Eric, this implies we should stop using the term 'hedge fodder' and promote the NCMD code.
neilpw
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Charlbury, Oxfordshire
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 268 times

Post by neilpw »

f8met wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 4:41 pm I found these 2 big lumps in the middle of a field. Messaged the landowner to say I had found them and that I would be leaving them in the field next to the power line pole. He took them away next time he was in the field. Wasn't going to carry them too far!

Screenshot_20241118_163925_WhatsApp.jpg
Thanks f8met, it sounds like the landowner preferred to make a trip to retrieve the objects rather than let them be thrown in a hedge. Again this suggests (at least some) landowners are unhappy about large iron (or anything wlse) being 'hedge fodder'.
neilpw
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Charlbury, Oxfordshire
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 268 times

Post by neilpw »

geoman wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 8:15 pm I often at the year end when delivering the Christmas bottle to farmers take along a photo of the rubbish cleared from their land. All are very supportive that i remove this material and it helps cement the relationship.
This is exemplary, do you retain all rubbish for a year or just large iron? Also, what are the benefits to the landowner of clearing different types of rubbish?
neilpw
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Charlbury, Oxfordshire
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 268 times

Post by neilpw »

KevinB wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:34 pm
Makes me so angry when I seen unfilled holes and the bit of junk left on the surface........ [27/]
Yes this is an insult to the landowner. Also every person who sees this will think badly of metal detecting as a hobby.
User avatar
f8met
Posts: 3879
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 2:32 pm
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 2238 times

Post by f8met »

neilpw wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:05 am Thanks f8met, it sounds like the landowner preferred to make a trip to retrieve the objects rather than let them be thrown in a hedge. Again this suggests (at least some) landowners are unhappy about large iron (or anything wlse) being 'hedge fodder'.
More likely he would be looking at them to see if he could reuse them.
Dave
User avatar
liamnolan
Posts: 12977
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:06 am
Location: Lincolnshire - originally from Dublin.
Has thanked: 3761 times
Been thanked: 3233 times
Contact:

Post by liamnolan »

The landowner is the one to decide where we can/cannot leave unwanted rubbish, metal or otherwise. so just ask him/her, simple as that. Large lumps of iron such as ploughshares or parts off tractors and trailers etc can be left on the side, visible to the tractor drivers, Liam [81/]
Deus, WSi's - In the end we will regret the chances we didn't take, the relationships we were afraid to have and decisions we waited too long to make .. Lewis Carroll
geoman
Posts: 1587
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:27 pm
Has thanked: 1631 times
Been thanked: 1157 times

Post by geoman »

neilpw wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:10 am This is exemplary, do you retain all rubbish for a year or just large iron? Also, what are the benefits to the landowner of clearing different types of rubbish?
Always done it dropping the bits in a bin behind the shed and before it goes to the tip take a photo on my phone to show the farmer along with the returned finds for the year. Always gets some comments especially about the amount of crap that turns up in the human sewerage waste that they spread on the fields in my part of the country.

The benefit of removing the rubbish is simply to make sure that i wont be digging it up again in coming years. On the odd rally i have been on the usual practice for many is to leave the rubbish by the hole or rebury it. For the landowner there is always the issue of large iron damaging machinery such as seed drills.

Now i could always save it for the FLO [49/]
neilpw
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Charlbury, Oxfordshire
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 268 times

Post by neilpw »

liamnolan wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2024 10:20 am The landowner is the one to decide where we can/cannot leave unwanted rubbish, metal or otherwise. so just ask him/her, simple as that. Large lumps of iron such as ploughshares or parts off tractors and trailers etc can be left on the side, visible to the tractor drivers, Liam [81/]
I suspect very few of us specifically ask the landowner what to do with large iron such as ploughshares. I'd be interested to hear what they say.
neilpw
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Charlbury, Oxfordshire
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 268 times

Post by neilpw »

geoman wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2024 10:21 am For the landowner there is always the issue of large iron damaging machinery such as seed drills. [49/]
Thanks for reply. Good point about large iron being a hazard to farm machinery.
User avatar
f8met
Posts: 3879
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 2:32 pm
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 2238 times

Post by f8met »

A couple of years ago the landowner shared a picture of a flat tyre with a piece of rusty metal poking out so damage is a real possibility and can cost £100s or low £1000s in damage. I did say i was surprised I hadn't found it.
Dave
neilpw
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Charlbury, Oxfordshire
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 268 times

Post by neilpw »

f8met wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:18 am A couple of years ago the landowner shared a picture of a flat tyre with a piece of rusty metal poking out so damage is a real possibility and can cost £100s or low £1000s in damage. I did say i was surprised I hadn't found it.
Thanks f8met, it seems important that we remove large (and small) iron and other rubbish from the field to reduce risk of future damage. By doing this we are providing a (small) service to farmers/landowners. I come back to my original question: Is it generally acceptable to farmers/landowners that we leave 'hedge fodder' (including large iron) in hedges?
Red Fred
Posts: 578
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:31 am
Location: Hants/Dorset
Has thanked: 570 times
Been thanked: 1018 times

Post by Red Fred »

I give a bit of a shudder every time I hear "hedgerow fodder."The notion of detectorists discarding items in the hedge simply because they are iron fuels the idea that they are just treasure hunting and don't really care about the history of the farm. Most farmers will find as much interest in an ancient tool, horseshoe or part of grandad's tractor as in an anonymous coin. So as well as the litter aspect, there is also the image to think of.
neilpw
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Charlbury, Oxfordshire
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 268 times

Post by neilpw »

Red Fred wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:12 pm I give a bit of a shudder every time I hear "hedgerow fodder" ... as well as the litter aspect, there is also the image to think of."
I agree with you Red Fred, and so does the NCMD:

'Dispose of all rubbish responsibly. It’s tempting to just throw anything you find that is of no interest into the hedge or leave it where you found it, but again it sheds a bad light on the hobby. Always take it home and bin it.' https://www.ncmd.co.uk/beginners-guide/

Every time we use the term 'hedge fodder' it encourages new detectorists (and each other) to throw rubbish in the hedge and sheds a bad light on the hobby generally. Instead we should encourage everyone to 'take it home and bin it'.
SimplexSimonx
Posts: 914
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2020 8:43 am
Location: Sussex
Has thanked: 664 times
Been thanked: 735 times

Post by SimplexSimonx »

Red Fred wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:12 pm I give a bit of a shudder every time I hear "hedgerow fodder."The notion of detectorists discarding items in the hedge simply because they are iron fuels the idea that they are just treasure hunting and don't really care about the history of the farm. Most farmers will find as much interest in an ancient tool, horseshoe or part of grandad's tractor as in an anonymous coin. So as well as the litter aspect, there is also the image to think of.
I agree. I recently found a bit of scrap metal that happened to be part of a 1930's electric fence energiser. The landowner remembered his dad using it in the 1960's and was quite touched to be reminded!
User avatar
sweepstick47
Moderator
Posts: 22630
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 8:21 pm
Location: North Lincolnshire
Has thanked: 5878 times
Been thanked: 8283 times

Post by sweepstick47 »

neilpw wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2024 5:58 am Thanks Eric, this implies we should stop using the term 'hedge fodder' and promote the NCMD code.
Absolutely right, as long ago as the early/mid 1970s responsible Detectorists have operated within the spirit of the code of conduct which was published in every copy of Treasure Hunting Magazine. In more recent years it has been updated and adopted by the NCMD, and now features prominently on their web site for adoption by their members.

Using the term Hedge Fodder flies in the face of the Code of Conduct which we responsible Detectorists have followed and abided by for some 50 years or more so it's very disappointing to see the term is still being used by some experienced operators [27/]
Cheers Eric
A disservice is no service at all.
Post Reply

Return to “Detecting guides and Tips”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests