Post July 2023. Time taken between stages

Metal detecting Hoards and Treasure finds.
Post Reply
Jungle
Posts: 629
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:49 pm
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 201 times

Post July 2023. Time taken between stages

Post by Jungle »

Is anyone finding timings have improved since the revised act?
It's now meant to be:
90 days for Treasure report to coroner.
28 days for a Museum claim to be made.
In my recent experiences they're not managing to meet this at the moment.

Not meant to be critical of the people doing the jobs but to highlight possible insufficient funding.
Deus II, 9" & 11", WS6 Mi-6 (upgrade path DEUS x35 9", 13" and 11", WS4, Original XP Deus 9", 11", 13", Elliptical, Fisher F75+Sunray, Minelab X-terra-50)
User avatar
Phil2401
Posts: 9212
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:31 pm
Location: Surrey, originally Yorkshire
Has thanked: 5615 times
Been thanked: 4654 times

Post by Phil2401 »

As you say, it's all to do with financial resources / staffing of the powers that be. I've very recently received this (extract from) a reply received from my FLO when I chased up a disclaimed potential treasure item - (a posy ring that they didn't think was quite 300 years old) -

"There is a permanent backlog over issuing disclaim paperwork and a further delay from Coroners in following it up. I have no control over either process and cannot say how long it can take as it varies dependent on a range of factors".

I guess the same principle also applies to items that are in fact 'treasure'.

In other words, patience is a virtue [08/]

Phil
Quaerite et invenietis
User avatar
fred
Posts: 18768
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 6:15 pm
Location: Kent
Has thanked: 6753 times
Been thanked: 14820 times

Post by fred »

Correspondence with other detectorists suggest that some FLO's seem to be getting the hang of disclaiming inconsequential Treasure finds but the more complex stuff seems to be taking as long as ever. I'm just about to launch two Treasure cases so I'll certainly ask the FLO about it and then keep tabs on how it goes. [81/]
Tang .233
Posts: 367
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2023 3:09 pm
Location: Lindum Colonia
Has thanked: 607 times
Been thanked: 485 times

Post by Tang .233 »

Found a gold Roman cameo ring in Aug 23.
Inquest nxt month .25
Report from BM to coroner was sorted quick time,
Coroner was a bit longer , but all moving in the same direction, now just waiting on the (TVC) 👍
Leg end
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 6:54 pm
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 739 times

Post by Leg end »

I have raised this with my FLO before and she stated that the time limits START from when they START their paperwork, and not when you hand an item over, therefore it could take months before they even start the process. As stated before, it all depends on personalities and their priorities.
Dave The Slave
Posts: 3624
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 2:53 pm
Has thanked: 12522 times
Been thanked: 2848 times

Post by Dave The Slave »

fred wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2025 6:36 pm Correspondence with other detectorists suggest that some FLO's seem to be getting the hang of disclaiming inconsequential Treasure finds but the more complex stuff seems to be taking as long as ever. I'm just about to launch two Treasure cases so I'll certainly ask the FLO about it and then keep tabs on how it goes. [81/]
Interesting about inconsequential Treasure finds, Fred.
Off tomorrow to the FLO, with a Silver thimble that looks to be Treasure but is also broken.
Most Silver thimbles are disclaimed and returned, would this mean the FLO has the ability to decide on the spot, whether to just Record, rather than going through the Treasure process.
Cheers, [81/]
Dave.
Bounty Hunter Tracker IV
Garrett 400 I
Alan Black
Posts: 625
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 746 times
Been thanked: 559 times

Post by Alan Black »

Leg end wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2025 3:44 pm I have raised this with my FLO before and she stated that the time limits START from when they START their paperwork, and not when you hand an item over, therefore it could take months before they even start the process.
Exactly, a museum has 30 days to register an interest to acquire which starts from when they recieve the completed treasure report which in itself can take an undetermined amount of time for various reasons.
Jungle
Posts: 629
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:49 pm
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 201 times

Post by Jungle »

Leg end wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2025 3:44 pm I have raised this with my FLO before and she stated that the time limits START from when they START their paperwork, and not when you hand an item over, therefore it could take months before they even start the process. As stated before, it all depends on personalities and their priorities.
Thats not how I read the revised act. Its 90 days for Treasure Report from when handed in.
AMDS/NCMD need to take this up with Mr Lewis AND the people who monitor the Treasure Act.
Deus II, 9" & 11", WS6 Mi-6 (upgrade path DEUS x35 9", 13" and 11", WS4, Original XP Deus 9", 11", 13", Elliptical, Fisher F75+Sunray, Minelab X-terra-50)
User avatar
fred
Posts: 18768
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 6:15 pm
Location: Kent
Has thanked: 6753 times
Been thanked: 14820 times

Post by fred »

Dave The Slave wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2025 9:20 am Interesting about inconsequential Treasure finds, Fred.
Off tomorrow to the FLO, with a Silver thimble that looks to be Treasure but is also broken.
Most Silver thimbles are disclaimed and returned, would this mean the FLO has the ability to decide on the spot, whether to just Record, rather than going through the Treasure process.
Cheers, [81/]
Dave.
As there is still paperwork and the recording involved I doubt if it will be decided at the time of handing it over. I would expect that the FLO to immediately have a pretty fair idea that he or she is likely to disclaim it though. Certainly worth asking how they are handling disclaiming. [81/]
Post Reply

Return to “Detecting Hoards and Treasure Finds”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests