I dont think that it is correct to say that the person claiming the item isn't interested in thanking the person who found it. With respect that is a very sweeping statement, and even if its true 95% of the time could well be due to the process for reclaiming the item. ie. is the claimant expressly told that he/she can register a message of thanks to be given to the finder, is the claimant asked if they would like the name and address of the finder (assuming the finder has given consent under the DPA)?, Is the claimant asked if they would like to leave a reward for the finder or make a donation to charity, I suspect the answer is these questions is no, but I am hoping to be told I am wrong.sussexjames wrote:
Also i do not think its a good policy to suggest not handing something on the basis you wont get caught. The morals unpinning such an action would in my book be questionable, but I do not dispute that you are unlikely to be caught. One scenario where you could be caught is if you try to sell the item on e-bay, or at jewlers close to the loss site.[/quote]
1) I can assure you there are some people out there so selfish that they have no interest in thanking the finder. A small number perhaps but I've witnessed this myself as have been the person handing it back to them. You'd think asking who was good enough to hand it in would be their first question? I've even been in positions where I've asked whether they'd like their contact details and been asked could I call them and thank them for them?! However the point I was trying to make (and my grammar may have let me down) was that often - EITHER the person isn't interested OR the system breaks down for one reason or another. I wasn't giving the former weight over the latter.
2) At no point have I suggested or condoned not handing something in on the basis your unlikely to get caught. My opinion of whether to hand it in, I thought, was quite clear. I merely stated, as you too rightly point out, the obvious in saying that in these circumstances its unlikely. I also didn't use the word 'caught' you did. I said 'be in trouble' . There is a difference but I'm not going in to it....[/quote]
My post wasnt an attack on you, I am sorry that you have taken it that way.