Hammered fragment for id please

Finds and artefacts found while out metal detecting which require identifying.
Forum rules
IMPORTANT
Please remember to read the in-post text when creating a ID request as it explains the mandatory requirements necessary to gain approval for your ID request.
Post Reply
StevieJ
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2023 7:57 pm
Has thanked: 1008 times
Been thanked: 155 times

Hammered fragment for id please

Post by StevieJ »

Hi All,
I found this fragment of hammered today, 2-3 inches down on pasture :);/. Very pleased, as I think it's the oldest coin I have found to date (my earliest so far being the Mary testoon I've posted about previously).
It gave a jumpy 15 on the manticore (which I treated myself to for christmas [88/]). Settings were All terrain general unmodified. Found in Lanarkshire but as far as I can tell, I don't think it is Scottish (happy to be corrected though). Any help with identification would be very gratefully received, although I appreciate it's seen much better days. I've orientated the photo's of the obverse to what I think is correct for the bust (so apologies the photo on scale appears upside down). I've added water to coin in a couple of pictures to help bring out the inscription.
71851711-CA47-4745-B8E0-9D393B38E32D.jpeg
9ED82153-1B7E-4793-AFDD-093451283A93.jpeg
F28AB765-1A83-4BFA-8FA2-0A61F036AA81.jpeg
E97D999B-5635-41CE-8576-C19BFFEDFAB5.jpeg
C2204316-712D-4DD5-899E-B3E86E577D6C.jpeg
83ACA1A6-DBF1-4A42-AE3B-AD1645635536.jpeg



Incidentally, I've only washed it with distilled water, so there was very little silver sulphide on this coin. This is a complete contrasts to the state of the George III six pence that I found not far way in the same field (viewtopic.php?p=1335574#p1335574). Can anyone tell me why it is that silver coins from the same field tarnish in a completely different manner? Is it the quality/source of the silver? Or perhaps the six pence was lost in the cow shed before the manure was spread on the field?

Thanks for looking and all ideas,
Stevie
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Alan Black
Posts: 746
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 916 times
Been thanked: 704 times

Post by Alan Black »

York mint. [81/]
StevieJ
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2023 7:57 pm
Has thanked: 1008 times
Been thanked: 155 times

Post by StevieJ »

Thanks Alan, much appreciated. Incidentally, what gave it away as York mint please?

I’ll see if I can track that hairdo down now.
User avatar
Allectus
Posts: 41632
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Essexshire ;-)
Has thanked: 1435 times
Been thanked: 20686 times

Post by Allectus »

Edward III York penny.
Only in it for the ££££'s =P~
StevieJ
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2023 7:57 pm
Has thanked: 1008 times
Been thanked: 155 times

Post by StevieJ »

Allectus wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 7:59 am Edward III York penny.
Brilliant, thank you Allectus. Very much appreciated indeed.
StevieJ
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2023 7:57 pm
Has thanked: 1008 times
Been thanked: 155 times

Post by StevieJ »

Alan Black wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 12:38 am York mint. [81/]
Got it. Ebo-rachi. I could see the RAC but hadn’t made the connection with Roman name of the city. Of course, Latin [54/]

Thanks Alan/Allectus
User avatar
ManOnTheMoon
Posts: 1273
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2022 12:12 pm
Location: North Cotswolds
Has thanked: 373 times
Been thanked: 1289 times

Post by ManOnTheMoon »

StevieJ wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 8:34 am Got it. Ebo-rachi. I could see the "RAC" but hadn’t made the connection with Roman name of the city. Of course, Latin
StevieJ, well done for spotting that. I confess I cannot decipher it on your coin.

I sometimes attempt to match MDF coin identifications to the Spink catalogue (2023 edition), in a effort to educate myself on coin identification. I confess that I don't often succeed, and this particular coin is a case in point. Could either you, Allectus or Alan Black please point out the "RAC" lettering that apparently identifies the York mint?

Additionally, which of the Edward III pennies i.e. Spink numbering, does this coin represent in the catalogue? I really do struggle to make sense of the identifying lettering and mints on these old hammered coins, and when they are as battered as this example I am left utterly bewildered that any identification can be made ... but it is. 🤯

Help. Please. 🥴
"The person who can enjoy the ordinary miserable days, is a happy fella."
Bob Mortimer in 'Gone Hogmanay Fishing'
User avatar
Allectus
Posts: 41632
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Essexshire ;-)
Has thanked: 1435 times
Been thanked: 20686 times

Post by Allectus »

[CIVI/TAS/EB]O/RACI. The 'RACI' is as plain as day....Quatrefoil at centre.
Only in it for the ££££'s =P~
User avatar
Allectus
Posts: 41632
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Essexshire ;-)
Has thanked: 1435 times
Been thanked: 20686 times

Post by Allectus »

[+EDW]ARDVS & annulet between pellets.
Only in it for the ££££'s =P~
StevieJ
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2023 7:57 pm
Has thanked: 1008 times
Been thanked: 155 times

Post by StevieJ »

ManOnTheMoon wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:28 am StevieJ, Could either you, Allectus or Alan Black please point out the "RAC" lettering that apparently identifies the York mint?
Will do but out at the moment. I find the Numista site is really useful as give the inscription in the font eg

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces376104.html
StevieJ
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2023 7:57 pm
Has thanked: 1008 times
Been thanked: 155 times

Post by StevieJ »

ManOnTheMoon wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:28 am Could either you, Allectus or Alan Black please point out the "RAC" lettering that apparently identifies the York mint?
RACI highlighted. See the link above for the inscription and script/font.
F28AB765-1A83-4BFA-8FA2-0A61F036AA81.jpeg
Regarding Spink number - I only got a copy recently and so am not that familiar with it, but I guess the coin could be 1531, 1585, 1602, 1604, 1605, 1613 1629?

Edit: 1585

Cheers
Stevie
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Makro 2
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2023 4:16 pm
Has thanked: 565 times
Been thanked: 1348 times

Post by Makro 2 »

It may have seen better days but that's all part of this little coins history and a Hammy is a Hammy whatever it's condition and that is always a good find [88/]

Well done on saving this little coins future...I rather like it [81/]

Regards.
M2
Nokta Makro Simplex+
Nokta Makro Legend

" Put your faith In God and keep your powder dry "
Oliver Cromwell
StevieJ
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2023 7:57 pm
Has thanked: 1008 times
Been thanked: 155 times

Post by StevieJ »

Makro 2 wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 6:53 pm It may have seen better days but that's all part of this little coins history and a Hammy is a Hammy whatever it's condition and that is always a good find [88/]

Well done on saving this little coins future...I rather like it [81/]

Regards.
M2
Thanks M2, and very true. I’m certainly very pleased with it and it’s from such an interesting time in Scottish/English history up here.
Post Reply

Return to “Identification of Detecting Finds”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beachdigger, exmoor man 1, hartsman, neilpw, Tang .233, UK_Detectorist and 545 guests