
Metal Density Testing Method
-
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 6:48 am
- Location: Hampshire
- Has thanked: 182 times
- Been thanked: 154 times
Make sure they are to 2 decimal places Dave and the lower the range the more accurate they will be unless you spend lots on them 

XP Deus I
Very interesting post.
In one field i found a marked earing 875 and presumably an asian gold ring .
The earing came well down in foil as would be expected but strangely the ring came in as zinc! (Both on its side and on its edge)
Using the method in the post the ring weighed 9.1 gm and displaced 0.5gm so although your scale doesnt go above 22c its just above it so i guess just over 22c?
Cannot think of anything else it can be in the same field was a tungstan ring which was mighty heavy but not gold coloured
It does though mean a better set of scales is needed before i am absolutely certain
Does the method work if the ring has stones in it?
In one field i found a marked earing 875 and presumably an asian gold ring .
The earing came well down in foil as would be expected but strangely the ring came in as zinc! (Both on its side and on its edge)
Using the method in the post the ring weighed 9.1 gm and displaced 0.5gm so although your scale doesnt go above 22c its just above it so i guess just over 22c?
Cannot think of anything else it can be in the same field was a tungstan ring which was mighty heavy but not gold coloured
It does though mean a better set of scales is needed before i am absolutely certain
Does the method work if the ring has stones in it?
-
- Posts: 7919
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 2:47 pm
- Location: Cheshire
- Has thanked: 1294 times
- Been thanked: 3863 times
I have tried this a few times. Results are very hit and miss.
Solid gold ring bands work fine as long as you use scales with two decimal places. Three would be better.
However most of what we find is an unknown alloy. Also bubbles in the casting process alter the results greatly. I checked the results with an Irregular iron hinge thing. Results came back as aluminium due the internal bubbles.
Smooth objects should be fine. Might retest on some known coins and try and calibrate the setup as Water volume alters greatly with temperature and also affects the results.
Smaller the volume the better
Solid gold ring bands work fine as long as you use scales with two decimal places. Three would be better.
However most of what we find is an unknown alloy. Also bubbles in the casting process alter the results greatly. I checked the results with an Irregular iron hinge thing. Results came back as aluminium due the internal bubbles.
Smooth objects should be fine. Might retest on some known coins and try and calibrate the setup as Water volume alters greatly with temperature and also affects the results.
Smaller the volume the better
-
- Posts: 6126
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:47 am
- Location: Herts
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 2025 times
As stated in my earlier post:
In theory, you could obtain more accuracy by allowing for density changes of the water. Tap water has a slightly different density to that of pure water, and the density of water varies with temperature. However, if you look at how much difference these two factors make, it is really small, not worth bothering with whatsoever.
In theory, you could obtain more accuracy by allowing for density changes of the water. Tap water has a slightly different density to that of pure water, and the density of water varies with temperature. However, if you look at how much difference these two factors make, it is really small, not worth bothering with whatsoever.
I don't see how this can be correct. Density is calculated by Mass (The weight of the object on your scales) divided by Volume (Which would be the millilitres of water displaced by the object. How can the scale measure volume? It can't, it can only give you a measurement of the mass.
Recent finds: Papal Bulla of Clement V, Mary Groat, James 1st Scottish 20p, Republican Silver Denarius 130BC, Trajan Silver Denarius, Edward VII Hammered Shilling.
- Twit
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2017 7:00 pm
- Has thanked: 1238 times
- Been thanked: 600 times
The object increases the volume of water weighed - it is as if the object was a volume of extra water, which via the weight of it measured, returns a density figure in the calculation.Trotboy wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:17 pm I don't see how this can be correct. Density is calculated by Mass (The weight of the object on your scales) divided by Volume (Which would be the millilitres of water displaced by the object. How can the scale measure volume? It can't, it can only give you a measurement of the mass.
-
- Posts: 7919
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 2:47 pm
- Location: Cheshire
- Has thanked: 1294 times
- Been thanked: 3863 times
I have tried it.
Works fine for smooth things like a gold ring.
Irregular objects catch too many air bubbles.
Anything porous forget it.
Most alloys forget it as you don't know what percentage of each element.
Small items, small errors equal big differences. A small lead object that was both porous and irregular came back as aluminium.
Nice to add another diagnostic tool but recognise it limitations.
Works fine for smooth things like a gold ring.
Irregular objects catch too many air bubbles.
Anything porous forget it.
Most alloys forget it as you don't know what percentage of each element.
Small items, small errors equal big differences. A small lead object that was both porous and irregular came back as aluminium.
Nice to add another diagnostic tool but recognise it limitations.
- Dave8472
- Posts: 12176
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:52 pm
- Location: Kent
- Has thanked: 2236 times
- Been thanked: 2048 times
Thread pictures fixed on first post
Dave
Dave

Minelab Manticore : 15” 11” 9” & 8” Coils
Minelab Equinox 800 : 11” Coil
CScope 4Pi
Garrett Pro Pointer AT
Garmin GPSMap 65s
Past Detectors : Explorer SE Pro, CTX3030, XP Deus I
Minelab Equinox 800 : 11” Coil
CScope 4Pi
Garrett Pro Pointer AT
Garmin GPSMap 65s
Past Detectors : Explorer SE Pro, CTX3030, XP Deus I
- fred
- Posts: 18911
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 6:15 pm
- Location: Kent
- Has thanked: 6985 times
- Been thanked: 15047 times
All this makes my brain hurt. I'll probably just settle for having the bath.MetalGuru wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:50 pmAbsolutly correct. The scientist was Archimedes, who jumped out of his bath shouting eureka, which means, 'I've found it'.The boss wrote:Neil and Julie,if I'm wrong but you can tell me lol but I think it started when an old scientist sat in a bath n wondered why the water rises,he then filled a measuring cylinder n added different object to the same amount of water and then come up with a mass equasion which would of evolved into this density equation lol I think that's right any how lol

- Phil2401
- Posts: 9571
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:31 pm
- Location: Surrey, originally Yorkshire
- Has thanked: 5830 times
- Been thanked: 4807 times
Just out of interest (Fred you may know the answer to this) - how much does it cost to have your friendly local jeweller do an acid scratch test and give you an accurate assessment?fred wrote: Sun Mar 18, 2018 4:53 pmAll this makes my brain hurt. I'll probably just settle for having the bath.MetalGuru wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:50 pmAbsolutly correct. The scientist was Archimedes, who jumped out of his bath shouting eureka, which means, 'I've found it'.The boss wrote:Neil and Julie,if I'm wrong but you can tell me lol but I think it started when an old scientist sat in a bath n wondered why the water rises,he then filled a measuring cylinder n added different object to the same amount of water and then come up with a mass equasion which would of evolved into this density equation lol I think that's right any how lol![]()
Phil
Quaerite et invenietis
- fred
- Posts: 18911
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 6:15 pm
- Location: Kent
- Has thanked: 6985 times
- Been thanked: 15047 times
Phil2401 wrote: Sun Mar 18, 2018 5:10 pmNothing if he thinks that you are thinking of selling it to him!fred wrote: Sun Mar 18, 2018 4:53 pmAll this makes my brain hurt. I'll probably just settle for having the bath.MetalGuru wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:50 pm
Absolutly correct. The scientist was Archimedes, who jumped out of his bath shouting eureka, which means, 'I've found it'.quote]
Just out of interest (Fred you may know the answer to this) - how much does it cost to have your friendly local jeweller do an acid scratch test and give you an accurate assessment?
PhilBe wary though because many high street jewellers are little more than salesmen and have no knowledge of precious metals beyond reading hallmarks.
- Phil2401
- Posts: 9571
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:31 pm
- Location: Surrey, originally Yorkshire
- Has thanked: 5830 times
- Been thanked: 4807 times
Thought that might be the reply
Below is a hardly scientific, but plausible account of the use of the Acrhimedes principle as a basis for measuring density -
http://www.longlongtimeago.com/once-upo ... den-crown/
Phil

Below is a hardly scientific, but plausible account of the use of the Acrhimedes principle as a basis for measuring density -
http://www.longlongtimeago.com/once-upo ... den-crown/
Phil
Quaerite et invenietis
- Rhumours
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2018 10:22 pm
- Has thanked: 331 times
- Been thanked: 312 times




And asking a jeweller to in essence value something usually carries a charge. If you want a piece of paper saying what it is that's a valuation for insurance purposes and usually costs 10% of the value of the item valued. "I would like this sized but not sure what metal it is could you check it is gold for me before I commit" is disgusting behaviour and I wouldn't offer that as a solution.
Garret AT Pro ~ Garret Carrot ~ Piranha 35 ~ rather nice wellies ~ registered NCMD member.
- Phil2401
- Posts: 9571
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:31 pm
- Location: Surrey, originally Yorkshire
- Has thanked: 5830 times
- Been thanked: 4807 times
Rhumours - if you actually read the post, nobody is asking a jeweller to 'value' the item, but merely to establish its precious metal content.Rhumours wrote: Sun Mar 18, 2018 6:02 pmwait .... na na na na na ..... this is a lie ..... or witchcraft. .... or both ...... but it can't possibly work. You have displaced nothing. And it wasn't to measure density it was to measure the volume of a uneven object like .... a branch of a tree or a spiky ball something odd shaped. Bring the water to the top of the container ... whatever spilled over was displaced which meant that the lost volume of water was exactly the dimensions of the inserted object. No jokes
This can't work surely
.... you may have increased the density of the water very marginally which may be what is being registered
And asking a jeweller to in essence value something usually carries a charge. If you want a piece of paper saying what it is that's a valuation for insurance purposes and usually costs 10% of the value of the item valued. "I would like this sized but not sure what metal it is could you check it is gold for me before I commit" is disgusting behaviour and I wouldn't offer that as a solution.
If also you were to read thought my previous post, you would understand better the correlation between weight / displacement / density etc....the ancient theories are not dissimilar to contemporary opinions.
Phil
Quaerite et invenietis
- Rhumours
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2018 10:22 pm
- Has thanked: 331 times
- Been thanked: 312 times
Phil2401 wrote: Sun Mar 18, 2018 6:12 pmRhumours - if you actually read the post, nobody is asking a jeweller to 'value' the item, but merely to establish its precious metal content.Rhumours wrote: Sun Mar 18, 2018 6:02 pmwait .... na na na na na ..... this is a lie ..... or witchcraft. .... or both ...... but it can't possibly work. You have displaced nothing. And it wasn't to measure density it was to measure the volume of a uneven object like .... a branch of a tree or a spiky ball something odd shaped. Bring the water to the top of the container ... whatever spilled over was displaced which meant that the lost volume of water was exactly the dimensions of the inserted object. No jokes
This can't work surely
.... you may have increased the density of the water very marginally which may be what is being registered
And asking a jeweller to in essence value something usually carries a charge. If you want a piece of paper saying what it is that's a valuation for insurance purposes and usually costs 10% of the value of the item valued. "I would like this sized but not sure what metal it is could you check it is gold for me before I commit" is disgusting behaviour and I wouldn't offer that as a solution.
If also you were to read thought my previous post, you would understand better the correlation between weight / displacement / density etc....the ancient theories are not dissimilar to contemporary opinions.
Phil
Phil

If you actually read my post as intended this would make sense to you

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=irony ... e&ie=UTF-8
I understand the principle just fine dude .... I did physics at school


Garret AT Pro ~ Garret Carrot ~ Piranha 35 ~ rather nice wellies ~ registered NCMD member.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests