Æ Dupondius.

Finds and artefacts found while out metal detecting which require identifying.
Forum rules
IMPORTANT
Please remember to read the in-post text when creating a ID request as it explains the mandatory requirements necessary to gain approval for your ID request.
Post Reply
Macsen Wledig
Posts: 1198
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2022 11:34 pm
Location: Lancashire
Has thanked: 2289 times
Been thanked: 1630 times

Æ Dupondius.

Post by Macsen Wledig »

Third one of these I've picked up now in 3 years and this one is probably the best too x;
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
It's not what you don't know that is the problem. It's what you think you know, that just isn't so.
User avatar
Allectus
Posts: 41632
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Essexshire ;-)
Has thanked: 1435 times
Been thanked: 20686 times

Post by Allectus »

Marcus Aurelius or Commodus sestertius.
Only in it for the ££££'s =P~
Macsen Wledig
Posts: 1198
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2022 11:34 pm
Location: Lancashire
Has thanked: 2289 times
Been thanked: 1630 times

Post by Macsen Wledig »

Thanks pal but I'm really confused now by the difference in a dupondius and a sestertius.
Thw first two in this picture where identified by yourself as Dupondius. The third looks exactly the same size and weight but is a sestertius?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
It's not what you don't know that is the problem. It's what you think you know, that just isn't so.
User avatar
Phil2401
Posts: 9571
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:31 pm
Location: Surrey, originally Yorkshire
Has thanked: 5830 times
Been thanked: 4807 times

Post by Phil2401 »

Is there any significant difference in weight between the two earlier ones and this latest one?

Phil
Quaerite et invenietis
Macsen Wledig
Posts: 1198
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2022 11:34 pm
Location: Lancashire
Has thanked: 2289 times
Been thanked: 1630 times

Post by Macsen Wledig »

Slightly. My scales aren't drug dealers so not massively accurate but first comes in at 1.6g. Second 1.8g and third 1.5g
It's not what you don't know that is the problem. It's what you think you know, that just isn't so.
LuckyB
Posts: 934
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 1:15 pm
Has thanked: 675 times
Been thanked: 1030 times

Post by LuckyB »

Roman_Coin_Denominations.png
I'm no expert [88/] but this is quite a good starter guide which I found useful, you can see there is an overlap in sizes but the weight is key, yours do seem to be a bit light for either! :)@'
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Macsen Wledig
Posts: 1198
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2022 11:34 pm
Location: Lancashire
Has thanked: 2289 times
Been thanked: 1630 times

Post by Macsen Wledig »

LuckyB wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2025 6:11 pm Roman_Coin_Denominations.png
I'm no expert [88/] but this is quite a good starter guide which I found useful, you can see there is an overlap in sizes but the weight is key, yours do seem to be a bit light for either! :)@'
thanks for that chart, saved.
And errrrr. Just ignore those points. And see

18g 16g and 15g

Why I thought there was a point don't even ask and how I thought s big bronze coin was weighing in at 1.5 grams....well it was early is my excuse
It's not what you don't know that is the problem. It's what you think you know, that just isn't so.
User avatar
Phil2401
Posts: 9571
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:31 pm
Location: Surrey, originally Yorkshire
Has thanked: 5830 times
Been thanked: 4807 times

Post by Phil2401 »

Macsen Wledig wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2025 6:29 pm thanks for that chart, saved.
And errrrr. Just ignore those points. And see

18g 16g and 15g

Why I thought there was a point don't even ask and how I thought s big bronze coin was weighing in at 1.5 grams....well it was early is my excuse
I was thinking you'd be a useless drug dealer (as per your previous post) with those scales! But the decimal point misplacement was I think noticed by those who are watching. Point is, the weights and sizes are so close it seems reasonable to assume that all three are a similar denomination.

Phil
Quaerite et invenietis
Macsen Wledig
Posts: 1198
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2022 11:34 pm
Location: Lancashire
Has thanked: 2289 times
Been thanked: 1630 times

Post by Macsen Wledig »

Phil2401 wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2025 6:52 pm I was thinking you'd be a useless drug dealer
I dunno if you where coming to score 18 grams and you where coming away with 1.8 I'd be making some serious profits. Though I think I may have a few complaints to try and avoid and ignore and it probably wouldn't be a sustainable business model
It's not what you don't know that is the problem. It's what you think you know, that just isn't so.
Post Reply

Return to “Identification of Detecting Finds”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beachdigger, exmoor man 1, Giz, neilpw, Tang .233, UK_Detectorist and 591 guests